ArticlePediatric quality & safety
Quality Improvement Initiative: Implementation of a Unified Pediatric Asthma Pathway Reduces Critical Care Requirements.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Asthma management is a leading cause of pediatric hospitalizations, contributing to a significant economic burden and critical care resource use. Standardized asthma care pathways have been shown to improve care delivery and resource allocation. We aimed to determine whether a unified asthma clinical pathway that integrates care across multiple care settings would reduce pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS) in an academic tertiary-care hospital. Methods: We designed a unified asthma pathway to integrate care across the emergency department, PICU, and ward. Quality improvement interventions included the unified clinical pathway, an electronic medical record order set, a standardized discharge checklist, and clinician education. The study team evaluated patients admitted with a primary diagnosis of asthma between 24 months and 18 years of age in the "baseline" group (May 2023-March 2024) or "intervention" group (April 2024-July 2025). The primary outcome was LOS, and the secondary outcomes were assessed using statistical process control charts. Wards-to-PICU transfers, 30-day hospital readmissions, and 7-day emergency department revisits served as balancing measures. Results: Overall hospital and PICU LOS remained consistent between the baseline (n = 168) and intervention periods (n = 217). After pathway implementation, there was a significant reduction in the number of patients requiring PICU-level care (31% versus 13%) and a reduction in the average time on continuous albuterol (7.4-3.2 h). Balancing measures remained unchanged between groups. Conclusions: Implementation of the unified asthma pathway in an academic tertiary-care hospital reduced the number of patients requiring PICU-level care and the time on continuous albuterol without an increase in adverse events.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.