ArticlePediatric quality & safety
Impact on Health Disparities: Secondary Analysis of an Unplanned Extubation Quality Improvement Study.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Quality improvement (QI) initiatives have reduced unplanned extubation (UE) rates in neonatal intensive care units, but few studies have examined the equity of these improvements. An explicit equity focus in QI can reveal disparities that may otherwise remain unrecognized. This secondary analysis of a previously published UE prevention QI initiative aimed to identify baseline disparities in UE rates and determine whether these disparities narrowed following the implementation of a standardized best-practice bundle (BPB). Methods: We reviewed 6 months of preintervention medical record data and stratified UE rates by race/ethnicity, preferred primary language, and socioeconomic status (insurance as a proxy). Using the Model for Improvement, the QI team implemented the BPB components sequentially and uniformly across the neonatal intensive care unit. Data collection continued throughout implementation. Statistical process control (U) charts were used to examine baseline disparities and assess changes over time. Results: At baseline, non-Hispanic Black infants, patients from English-speaking families, and Medicaid-insured patients had higher UE rates. Following the implementation of the BPB, UE rates decreased across all subgroups. Control charts showed special-cause variation beginning in December 2022. Differences in UE rates across racial/ethnic, language, and socioeconomic groups narrowed. Conclusions: UE rates were higher among racial minority and lower socioeconomic status populations at baseline. A standardized QI approach was associated with lower UE rates across all subgroups and reduced baseline disparities.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.