ArticleAoB PLANTS2026
Branching hierarchy shapes branch-leaf allometry and trait coordination in mountain shrubs of Dongling Mountain, Beijing.
Article in AoB PLANTS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Branch-leaf allometry is fundamental to understanding biomass allocation, leaf deployment, and resource-use strategies in woody plants. However, most studies have focused on trees or terminal twigs, while the role of branching hierarchy in shaping branch-leaf relationships in shrubs remains poorly understood. In this study, we investigated 12 dominant shrub species from Dongling Mountain, Beijing, China, and examined how 11 branch-leaf traits, allometric relationships, and trait coordination varied among architectural life forms, elevational zones, slope aspects, and branch orders. The results showed: except for the total leaf biomass, all other branch-leaf traits showed non-significant phylogenetic signal, and phylogenetic PCA did not reveal clear separation among life forms, elevation zones, or slope aspects, suggesting that trait variation was not primarily structured by phylogenetic relatedness. Branch-leaf traits varied significantly across ecological and architectural groups. With increasing branch order, branch cross-sectional area, branch length, branch volume, total leaf biomass, and branch biomass decreased, whereas mass-based and volume-based leafing intensity increased. Branch-leaf allometric relationships were scale-dependent: relationships that were allometric at the whole-plant level tended to become isometric or near-isometric at the branch level. Individual leaf mass was negatively associated with leafing intensity, supporting a leaf size-number trade-off in shrubs. Plant trait networks further showed that lower-order branches were dominated by simple structural covariation, whereas higher-order branches exhibited stronger coordination among branch architecture, leaf number, and biomass allocation. These findings demonstrate that branching hierarchy is a key organizational level shaping branch-leaf allometry and trait coordination in mountain shrubs. Considering branch order can therefore improve our understanding of shrub resource allocation strategies and architectural adaptation in heterogeneous mountain environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.