ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Adaptation of faba bean cultivars across Norwegian environments: identification of elite material and definition of optimal breeding and cultivar testing procedures.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Faba bean cultivation in northern Europe is challenged by high variability in yield performance due to strong genotype × environment interaction (GEI). Appropriate GEI modeling and interpretation is essential for both cultivar recommendation and breeding for Nordic conditions. Methods: Grain yield data from fifteen spring faba bean cultivars evaluated in eleven Norwegian environments during four growing seasons (2022-2025) were analyzed using the Additive Main Effects and Multiplicative Interaction (AMMI) model. Climatic drivers of GEI were investigated using factorial regression, while genome-wide SNP markers were used to assess the relationship between molecular diversity and adaptive differentiation. Results: Environment, genotype, and GEI significantly influenced grain yield. The AMMI model with three GEI principal components (AMMI3) represented the biologically meaningful GEI signal and explained 83.4% of the GEI variation. The predictive accuracy of this model closely approached that of BLUP and GBLUP. Factorial regression showed that maximum and mean September temperatures explained 38.5% of the GEI variation, indicating that late-season thermal conditions are the principal environmental drivers of cultivar adaptation. We identified three top-yielding genotypes (Ketu, Birgit, and Vire) that can be object of site-specific recommendation. Two sub-regions emerged as possibly distinct breeding targets, namely, a major one, and a smaller one featuring cooler late-cycle temperatures and specific adaptation of very early material. A significant Mantel correlation between genomic and adaptive dissimilarity (r = 0.40, P = 0.029) suggested that differences in environmental adaptation have a measurable genetic basis. Conclusions: This study identified elite cultivars for recommendation and generated crucial information for future crop breeding and variety testing in Norway. Breeding for wide adaptation across climatically diversified environments is justified by the modest size of the smaller sub-region and its expected decreasing importance due to climate change. The relationship between genomic and adaptive dissimilarity, if confirmed for a larger genotype set, could be exploited for a preliminary screening of regional breeding material and novel plant introductions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.