SynthesisFrontiers in neuroscience2026
Transcranial direct current stimulation for learning and memory in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cognitive impairment affecting memory and learning processes is a common non-motor feature of Parkinson's disease (PD) and contributes substantially to functional decline and a reduced quality of life. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has emerged as a potentially beneficial non-invasive neuromodulation technique capable of modulating cortical plasticity and enhancing cognitive and motor performance. However, its specific effects on memory- and learning-related outcomes in PD remain unclear. Objective: To systematically review and synthesize the available evidence regarding the effects of tDCS on memory and learning processes in individuals with Parkinson's disease. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, with the protocol registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024559548). PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched between September and December 2025. Randomized controlled trials in individuals with PD evaluating the effects of tDCS on memory-, learning-, or cognition-related outcomes were included. Study selection, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment (ROB-2) were performed systematically. Results: Nineteen studies (2006-2024) with sample sizes of 9-42 participants were included. Most protocols used 1-2 mA stimulation targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and primary motor cortex (M1). Improvements were observed in working memory, verbal fluency, executive function, and processing speed, particularly in multi-session protocols combined with cognitive or motor training. M1 stimulation was associated with enhanced motor learning consolidation, whereas single-session interventions showed limited effects. Limitations include small samples, methodological heterogeneity, and limited follow-up. Conclusion: Current evidence suggests potential effects of tDCS in memory and learning processes in PD, although evidence remains limited and heterogeneous, especially when delivered in repeated sessions and combined with training targeting frontostriatal dysfunction. However, variability in protocols and study quality limits generalizability. Larger, well-controlled trials with standardized designs are needed to establish robust clinical recommendations. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024559548, identifier CRD42024559548.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.