ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2026
Time-resolved hemodynamic responses to sentence-level speech perception, production, and self-monitoring.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has been widely used to explore the neural mechanisms underlying speech processing. However, the intertwining of perception and production that exists in real-world scenarios remains underexplored due to challenges such as gradient noise and head motion artifacts from speaking. Previous research has often employed sparse-sampling designs, pausing image acquisition intermittently to present auditory stimuli or record overt speech. While this approach mitigates some challenges, it cannot capture continuous brain activity during speech processing and does not separate the mixed hemodynamic responses to external and self-generated speech occurring in succession. We overcame these limitations and continuously scanned 31 participants as they listened to and recited English sentences. Through independent component analysis (ICA), we decomposed each functional scan into spatially independent components (ICs), identifying task-related ICs with activations predominantly located in the superior temporal cortex, inferior frontal gyrus, and orofacial sensorimotor cortex. These ICs demonstrated time-resolved hemodynamic responses corresponding to distinct stages of speech perception, planning, and production. A linear subtraction between the IC time courses from the listening-reciting (perception-to-production) and listening (perception-only) tasks further revealed a secondary hemodynamic response to self-generated speech in the superior temporal cortex. Furthermore, we established precise temporal relationships between overt speech output and the peak, rise, and fall of hemodynamic responses for each independent component. Together, we present a methodological framework that can inform future fMRI studies on naturalistic tasks involving the perception of external auditory stimuli and monitoring of self-generated sounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.