ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Photodynamic therapy remodels cutaneous tumor immunity: innate priming, suppressive feedback, and translational opportunities.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an established local treatment for actinic keratoses, Bowen disease, and selected low-risk basal cell carcinomas, but its potential to reshape antitumor immunity may extend its value beyond direct phototoxicity. We conducted a narrative synthesis of clinical, translational, and mechanistic evidence, supplemented by targeted searches through August 2026, and appraised major findings using a three-level evidence-maturity framework. Current evidence supports a temporally organized model in which PDT-induced reactive oxygen species promote tumor and microvascular injury, immunogenic cell death, damage-associated molecular pattern release, tumor-antigen exposure, innate immune-cell recruitment, dendritic-cell activation, and subsequent T-cell priming. This early immune-priming phase may be followed by suppressive feedback involving hypoxia, tumor-associated macrophages, regulatory T cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, PD-1/PD-L1 signaling, and IL-10/TGF-β. Evidence maturity and translational relevance vary across cutaneous neoplasms: clinical use is best established for actinic keratoses, Bowen disease, and superficial or selected low-risk basal cell carcinomas, whereas PDT-based immunotherapy combinations in invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and melanoma remain predominantly preclinical or exploratory. In cSCC models, ALA-PDT combined with PD-L1 blockade improved control of primary and distant tumors, providing preclinical support for further translational evaluation of checkpoint-based combinations. Preclinical timing studies further suggest that combination efficacy may depend on aligning checkpoint blockade with the post-PDT T-cell activation window. Photosensitizer localization, fluence, irradiance, oxygenation, and treatment schedule may likewise determine whether PDT favors immunogenic priming or excessive tissue injury and suppressive rebound. These findings position PDT as a parameter-tunable local immune-priming platform whose clinical translation should integrate indication-specific selection, treatment-parameter optimization, temporal immune monitoring, rationally timed combination therapy, and prospective clinical validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.