ArticleiScience2026
Uncertainty aware resilience enhancement of energy hub integrated distribution networks under heterogeneous disturbance events.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study develops a 24 h mixed integer linear programming framework for resilient operation of an integrated electricity, gas, and heat distribution system with energy hubs under prescribed outages and operating uncertainty. Electrical and thermal demand and wind and photovoltaic shortfalls are represented through budgeted polyhedral adverse point scheduling. Five cases compare a no-event reference, a combined outage baseline, radial reconfiguration, energy storage, and coordinated electrical and thermal demand response on the IEEE 33-bus system. Energy storage provides the strongest overall performance, reducing operating cost, expected energy not supplied, and peak shedding by 20.33%, 49.26%, and 30.44% relative to the combined outage baseline. Reconfiguration reduces shedding hours from 19 to 9 and the longest interruption from 19 to 5 h. Sensitivity and fixed plan stress analyses preserve the favorable storage ranking, showing that coordinated multi-energy flexibility can improve service continuity under heterogeneous disturbances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.