ArticleAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2026
Barrier identification and strategic design for hypertriglyceridemia management in the post-acute coronary syndrome patient population at a large integrated health system.
Article in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Patients on statin therapy with persistent hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) (TG > 150 mg/dL) post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are at increased risk of residual cardiovascular disease (CVD). Despite recommendations to incorporate icosapent ethyl (IPE) to reduce recurrent CV events, HTG care is not standardized. We aimed to 1) co-design a strategy package to improve CV risk management in post-ACS patients with HTG, and 2) assess TG care changes following the pilot. Methods: A pre-implementation survey assessed clinician perspectives of standardizing HTG management. Contextual inquiries informed a deliberative engagement session to co-design implementation strategies. One cardiology clinic piloted the final package. Resource use and electronic health record data were assessed for outcomes and care patterns. Results: Survey responses (N = 16) indicated that a standardized TG management approach is acceptable, appropriate, and feasible. Clinician interviews (N = 7) highlighted lack of priority in HTG care. IPE is favored for CV benefit, but coverage concerns persisted despite established institutional routinization. A strategy package to overcome identified barriers was finalized following deliberative engagement. 50% (20/40) of invited clinicians attended the pilot presentation, and 7.5% used additional resources and workflow strategies. Medication use was consistent among eligible patients, but 1.1% received IPE, limited to severe HTG (>500 mg/dL). Conclusion: Operationalized clinician strategies had varied uptake, and IPE use remained minimal. An educational presentation from experts demonstrated importance of intervention but did not translate to clinician motivation. Findings highlight areas for improvement and inform early development of a standardized clinical pathway to reduce CVD risk in post-ACS patients with HTG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.