ArticleBody & society2026
A feminist neomaterialist exploration of bariatric surgery in Canada.
Article in Body & society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rates of bariatric (weight loss) surgery have risen sharply in recent years as interventions into fatness have become increasingly medicalized and debates surrounding it binarized. We adopted a feminist neomaterialist perspective to challenge binary framings of weight loss surgery experiences still dominating the field's conventional and critical approaches by thinking relationally about entanglements of discourse and materiality. Within our neomaterialist framework, we used conceptual tools from misfitting, debility, and affect theory to analyze interviews with 21 women residing in Canada who had surgery at least 1 year prior. Using reflexive thematic analysis and thinking with theory, we generated three processually oriented themes: the force of pre-surgical (mis)fitting, (un)certainty of a (non)fat future, and post-surgery as a liminal space. We argue that while surgery is often presented as a pathway to normality and "fitting in," ambiguity and liminality emerge as hallmarks of post-surgery experience, unsettling binaristic portrayals of these surgeries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.