Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42774999›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2026

Marketplace coverage during pregnancy: what can we learn from state-level variation?

Julia C P Eddelbuettel, Alison A Galbraith, Sarah H Gordon, Anjali Kaimal, Laura F Garabedian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julia C P EddelbuettelPhD Program in Health Policy, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9134-6570
Alison A GalbraithDepartment of Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center & Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02119, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7309-5915
Sarah H GordonDepartment of Health Law, Policy, & Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02118, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4743-2014
Anjali KaimalDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL 33606, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7015-6583
Laura F GarabedianDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School & Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA 02215, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0014-4181

Funding

The Impact of Including Pregnancy as a Qualifying Life Event for Marketplace Special Enrollment on Child and Maternal HealthR01HD111508 · NICHD · HARVARD PILGRIM HEALTH CARE, INC. · PI Laura Faden Garabedian · 2023 to 2026
$1.9M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD111508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Little is known about the role of the Affordable Care Act Marketplaces in providing health insurance coverage for pregnant women. Methods: Using PRAMS survey data from 2018-2019 from 36 states and Washington, DC, we estimated the percentage of women with a pregnancy resulting in live birth who had Marketplace coverage during pregnancy, overall, by state, by federal poverty level (FPL) categories, and by state-based vs federal Marketplace status. We also describe the preconception and postpartum insurance status and sociodemographic and health characteristics of pregnant Marketplace enrollees. Results: Overall, 4.9% of women who had a live birth had Marketplace coverage during pregnancy in 2018-2019. This percentage varied by state (1.6% in Iowa to 13.1% in Maryland) and was significantly higher in state-based Marketplaces vs federally-run/facilitated Marketplaces (8.0% vs 3.5%) and among premium subsidy-eligible women (ie, <400% FPL). Pregnant Marketplace enrollees were more similar to pregnant women with Medicaid than those with private insurance in terms of sociodemographic characteristics and clinical predictors of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Conclusion: Marketplace coverage is a small, but important coverage source for women who had a live birth, insuring 1 in 20 women in our sample. The extent to which pandemic-era and recent policies affected Marketplace coverage of this population merits further investigation.

Indexed as

Affordable Care Actinsurance coverageMarketplacesmaternal healthPRAMSpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID42774999
PMCPMC13596735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.