ArticleHealth affairs scholar2026
Marketplace coverage during pregnancy: what can we learn from state-level variation?
Article in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Little is known about the role of the Affordable Care Act Marketplaces in providing health insurance coverage for pregnant women. Methods: Using PRAMS survey data from 2018-2019 from 36 states and Washington, DC, we estimated the percentage of women with a pregnancy resulting in live birth who had Marketplace coverage during pregnancy, overall, by state, by federal poverty level (FPL) categories, and by state-based vs federal Marketplace status. We also describe the preconception and postpartum insurance status and sociodemographic and health characteristics of pregnant Marketplace enrollees. Results: Overall, 4.9% of women who had a live birth had Marketplace coverage during pregnancy in 2018-2019. This percentage varied by state (1.6% in Iowa to 13.1% in Maryland) and was significantly higher in state-based Marketplaces vs federally-run/facilitated Marketplaces (8.0% vs 3.5%) and among premium subsidy-eligible women (ie, <400% FPL). Pregnant Marketplace enrollees were more similar to pregnant women with Medicaid than those with private insurance in terms of sociodemographic characteristics and clinical predictors of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Conclusion: Marketplace coverage is a small, but important coverage source for women who had a live birth, insuring 1 in 20 women in our sample. The extent to which pandemic-era and recent policies affected Marketplace coverage of this population merits further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.