ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2026
Abscopal effect following palliative radiotherapy after cemiplimab in recurrent cervical cancer: a case report.
Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The abscopal effect is a rare phenomenon in which localized radiotherapy induces regression of distant, non-irradiated metastatic lesions through systemic immune activation. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors may enhance this response, reports in recurrent cervical cancer remain limited. Case Presentation: A 56-year-old woman with stage IVA squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix underwent definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Six months later, computed tomography (CT) revealed recurrence with para-aortic lymph node, liver, and lung metastases. Following systemic chemotherapy, she received three cycles of cemiplimab; however, progressive disease developed, including new bone metastases. Palliative radiotherapy was administered to the symptomatic bone lesions. Three months after radiotherapy, follow-up CT demonstrated marked regression of the liver and lung metastases outside the irradiated field, consistent with an abscopal effect. Based on this favorable systemic response, cemiplimab therapy was resumed. The clinical course suggests that radiotherapy may have enhanced systemic antitumor immunity in the setting of prior PD-1 blockade. Conclusion: This case demonstrates a radiographically significant abscopal effect following palliative radiotherapy after cemiplimab therapy in recurrent cervical cancer. The combination of radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibition may provide synergistic antitumor activity; however, further studies are needed to determine its clinical significance and optimal use in advanced gynecologic malignancies. Further studies are warranted to clarify the mechanisms, predictive biomarkers, and optimal treatment sequencing to maximize the likelihood of inducing the abscopal effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.