Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42774965›Full record

ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2026

Compression Suture Staple Repair of Simulated Gluteus Medius Partial Tendon Tears Provides Increased Contact Pressure Compared With Stepwise Bridged Repair.

J Houston Dove, David P Beason, Glenn S Fleisig, Benton A Emblom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J Houston DoveAmerican Sports Medicine Institute Birmingham Alabama U.S.A.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3752-1865
David P BeasonAmerican Sports Medicine Institute Birmingham Alabama U.S.A.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1403-3746
Glenn S FleisigAmerican Sports Medicine Institute Birmingham Alabama U.S.A.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9029-8749
Benton A EmblomAmerican Sports Medicine Institute Birmingham Alabama U.S.A.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1357-7506

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the contact mechanics of 2 different suture anchor configuration constructs for gluteus medius repair in partial-thickness tears and to define an optimal distance for anchor placement in a biomechanical model. Methods: Trochanteric bone was simulated using polyurethane foam blocks, and a polyurethane rubber was used as a surrogate for the gluteus medius tendon tissue. As the rubber remained partially attached to the foam, this design simulated a partial-thickness tear without any retraction of the tendon tissue. A pressure sensor was used to collect contact data. Repairs were performed with knotless suture anchors. Three different 2-anchor repair interval distances (10, 15, and 20 mm) were first tested to define the optimal distance for anchor placement. We then performed 2 different 3-anchor repairs (stepwise bridged and compression suture staple) using the optimal distance. Pressure data were collected and compared between 3-anchor groups. Results: Results from the 2-anchor interval distance testing showed an overall significant effect for contact force ( Conclusions: In this biomechanical study, the compression suture staple technique exerted more pressure than the stepwise bridged repair technique at time 0 with no cyclic loading. Additionally, 15 mm had the greatest contact pressure of those examined for anchor placement using knotless suture anchors for these repairs. Clinical Relevance: By studying the contact mechanics of different suture anchor configurations, we determined which setup may provide better compression of the tendon onto the bone.

Identifiers

PMID42774965
PMCPMC13596692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.