ArticleBehavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
Synchronous human-dolphin foraging increases fishing success despite prey unpredictability.
Article in Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Foraging theory predicts that individuals adjust their behavior in response to environmental conditions and prey availability. One solution to finding and capturing unpredictable prey is social foraging, yet it remains unclear whether its benefits arise from behavioral coordination itself or simply from predators co-occurring under favorable environmental conditions. We examine how environmental conditions shape the outcome of social foraging between predators-dolphins and human fishers-that forage together on patchy, ephemeral migratory mullet schools. Using fisher catch as our empirical measure of foraging success, we test whether mullet abundance and catch are influenced by local environmental conditions, or whether social foraging buffers fishers from fluctuations in prey availability. Using confirmatory path analysis, we investigate the links among environmental conditions, mullet abundance, predators' abundance, and synchronous behavior to determine their relative influence on prey capture. Our results indicate 2 pathways to higher prey capture. First, fishers catch more mullet when these are more abundant (typically under northerly winds), but environmental conditions do not predict dolphin-fisher foraging synchrony. Second-and independently-more dolphins are present during flood tides, which leads to more fishers, more synchronous foraging, and more mullet caught. These moment-by-moment analyses demonstrate that behavioral coordination, rather than prey availability or shared environmental responses alone, is the primary driver of fisher success. More broadly, our results provide a mechanistic understanding of how social foraging can buffer predators against environmental variability, highlighting the role of coordination in overcoming prey unpredictability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.