Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42774941›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Dopamine modulation of motor and implicit learning contributions to auditory temporal attention.

Arnaud Zalta, Lena-Franziska Spitz, Alfons Schnitzler, Benjamin Morillon, Esther Florin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Arnaud ZaltaAix Marseille Université, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Marseille, France.
Lena-Franziska SpitzInstitute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Alfons SchnitzlerInstitute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Benjamin MorillonAix Marseille Université, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Marseille, France.
Esther FlorinInstitute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Auditory periodic temporal attention operates optimally around 1.5 Hz when temporal structure is judged explicitly. Synchronized rhythmic movements further enhance its efficacy, an effect thought to depend on basal ganglia dopamine, crucial for both motor and temporal processing. However, whether dopamine underpins the relationship between auditory temporal attention and motor activity remains unclear. Using an auditory temporal attention task in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients ON versus OFF the dopaminergic medication L-DOPA, alongside healthy controls, we found no evidence that dopamine modulates the ∼1.5 Hz optimal sampling rate of auditory temporal attention. However, dopamine enables motor synchronization to the auditory stream and is hence crucial for the motor benefits of auditory temporal attention. Performing the first session ON L-DOPA also improved performance in the following session. These findings underscore a selective role for dopamine in audio-motor interaction, with no evidence that the intrinsic rhythm of auditory attention depends on dopamine.

Indexed as

audio-motor interactionbehaviordopamineParkinson’s diseasetemporal prediction

Identifiers

PMID42774941
PMCPMC13594850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.