Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42774933›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2026

Self-reported aggressiveness does not follow facial masculinization in diverse South Asian populations.

Karel Kleisner, Zuzana Štěrbová, Vojtěch Fiala, Eliška Podgorná, Abhishikta Ghosh Roy, Banita Behera, Deepika Rani, Kewal Krishan, Stanzin Namga, Sanzida Khatun and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Karel KleisnerDepartment of Philosophy and History of Science, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, 128 44 Prague 2, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3277-8365
Zuzana ŠtěrbováDepartment of Philosophy and History of Science, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, 128 44 Prague 2, Czech Republic.
Vojtěch FialaDepartment of Philosophy and History of Science, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, 128 44 Prague 2, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0148-5092
Eliška PodgornáDepartment of Natural Sciences and Archaeometry, Institute of Archaeology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Letenská 123/4, 118 00 Prague 1, Czech Republic.
Abhishikta Ghosh RoyDepartment of Anthropology, Visva-Bharati, A Central University and an Institute of National Importance, Santiniketan, Birbhum District 731235, West Bengal, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8286-4202
Banita BeheraAnthropological Survey of India, Ministry of Culture, Government of India, 27 Jawaharlal Nehru Road, Kolkata 700016, West Bengal, India.
Deepika RaniDepartment of Anthropology, Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014, Chandigarh Union Territory, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1924-3347
Kewal KrishanDepartment of Anthropology, Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014, Chandigarh Union Territory, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5321-0958
Stanzin NamgaDepartment of Geology, University of Jammu, Baba Saheb Ambedkar Road, Jammu 180006, Jammu and Kashmir, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4523-5853
Sanzida KhatunDepartment of Anatomy, Birat Medical College Teaching Hospital, Tankisinuwari, Morang 56613, Koshi Province, Nepal.
Abdul Raheem JesmilDepartment of Archaeology, Ministry of Buddhasasana, Religious and Cultural Affairs, Sir Marcus Fernando Mawatha, Colombo 00700, Western Province, Sri Lanka.
Abdul HameedDepartment of Archaeology, Hazara University Mansehra, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 21120, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9952-2930
Viktor ČernýDepartment of Natural Sciences and Archaeometry, Institute of Archaeology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Letenská 123/4, 118 00 Prague 1, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1197-6634

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been suggested that sexually dimorphic facial traits are related to competitive behavior and aggression, but empirical evidence remains inconsistent and is based on a small number of populations and culturally homogeneous samples. We have combined geometric morphometric analyses with hierarchical Bayesian modeling of sixteen culturally and geographically diverse but understudied ethnic groups in order to test whether self-reported aggression covaries with facial sexual shape dimorphism within and between populations. Across populations, we found no consistent association between the individual level of facial sexual dimorphism and self-reported aggression in either sex. Although populations did differ in mean aggression levels, mean self-reported aggression covaried neither with the magnitude of sexual dimorphism nor with overall facial masculinization. Finally, sex differences in self-reported aggression did not reflect morphological sex differences. These findings challenge the generalizability of claims that aggression is encoded in the sexually dimorphic facial structure.

Indexed as

Bayesian modelingcross-cultural variationfacial morphologygeometric morphometricshuman facepersonalitysexual dimorphismsexual selection

Identifiers

PMID42774933
PMCPMC13596738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.