ArticleMolecular therapy. Advances2026
Transduction efficiency in clinical CAR T cell products: A retrospective study at a single center.
Article in Molecular therapy. Advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transduction efficiency (TE) is a key measure of CAR T cell manufacturing quality; however, its variability and relationship to the final product phenotype remain incompletely understood. In this retrospective study, we evaluated TE across 204 GMP-manufactured CAR T cell products, integrating manufacturing parameters, starting material composition, and immunophenotypic and transcriptomic profiles of final products. Multivariable linear regression and protocol-specific correlation analyses were performed to account for manufacturing-related confounding. TE variability was primarily associated with integrated manufacturing workflows and starting material composition. The CD4CD8-Prodigy-TransAct workflow was associated with higher TE compared with the CD4CD8-Bag-Dynabeads workflow, although contribution of individual manufacturing parameters could not be independently determined due to protocol-specific interdependencies. Within PBMC-based manufacturing, monocyte abundance was negatively associated with TE, suggesting protocol-dependent contributions of starting material composition. Higher TE was associated with a less differentiated T cell phenotype, including lower effector memory T cell (T
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.