ArticleEnvironment & health (Washington, D.C.)2026
Effect of Skin Types and Microenvironment of Dermal Exposure to Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Derivatives and Heavy Metals.
Article in Environment & health (Washington, D.C.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dermal exposure is one of the main ways for the human body to adsorb atmospheric pollutants, and different skin types significantly affect the adsorption of pollutants. This study established a simulation device using polyethylene balloons coated with different doses of glycerol trioleate to simulate oily skin, neutral skin, and dry skin types and investigated the adsorption of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and their derivatives (NPAHs and OPAHs) and metal elements on different skin types. The results show that (1) the adsorption of NPAHs and OPAHs with different ring numbers conforms to the first-order kinetic model. The adsorption concentration of NPAHs and OPAHs by balloon-simulated skin is the highest on the oily surface, followed by the neutral surface, and the lowest on the dry surface. (2) In the four scenarios analyzed in this study, the adsorption of NPAHs and OPAHs by the skin showed that the adsorption amount was the highest in dusty weather and the lowest in the indoor area of the campus. In the indoor and outdoor environments of the campus, the adsorption amount of NPAHs was greater than that of OPAHs. (3) Among the 11 heavy metals detected, Cu was detected only in sand-blowing weather, while As, Zn, V, and Ti were detected in four cases, and their adsorption capacity was accorded with the order of V > Zn > As > Ti. Therefore, the health risks associated with skin contact with pollutants on oily skin and during sandy weather should be given more attention, and appropriate protective measures should be implemented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.