ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
Insights into artificial intelligence-based digital pathology in hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancer.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI)-driven digital pathology has emerged as a promising approach for improving diagnosis, prognostic assessment, and treatment decision-making in hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancers (HPCs). By leveraging whole-slide imaging and deep learning, AI enables high-throughput and reproducible analysis of complex histopathological data, facilitating precision oncology. This review summarizes recent advances in AI-assisted digital pathology across hepatocellular carcinoma, biliary tract cancer, and pancreatic cancer, with a focus on diagnostic applications, molecular prediction, prognostic modeling, and treatment response assessment. Despite rapid technical progress, the clinical translation of AI remains limited. Current challenges extend beyond model performance and include data heterogeneity, limited interpretability, lack of prospective validation, and insufficient integration into clinical workflows. Notably, the central limitation lies in the misalignment between algorithm development and clinically relevant problem definition. Future research should prioritize multicenter validation, multimodal data integration, and the development of biologically informed and clinically interpretable models. Importantly, AI is expected to evolve from a diagnostic support tool to a dynamic, workflow-integrated decision-support system. Overall, the impact of AI-driven digital pathology will depend not only on technological advancement, but on its ability to deliver measurable clinical benefit and to be effectively embedded into real-world clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.