Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42774753›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026

Prognostic and therapeutic implications of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in ovarian cancer.

Weronika Pawul, Paulina Opoka, Agata Dusza, Bernard Blajerski, Julia Orzelska, Natalia Gierulska, Krzysztof Kułak, Rafał Tarkowski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Weronika PawulStudent's Scientific Association at the I Chair and Department of Gynaecological Oncology and Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Paulina OpokaStudent's Scientific Association at the I Chair and Department of Gynaecological Oncology and Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Agata DuszaStudent's Scientific Association at the I Chair and Department of Gynaecological Oncology and Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Bernard BlajerskiStudent's Scientific Association at the I Chair and Department of Gynaecological Oncology and Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Julia OrzelskaStudent's Scientific Association at the I Chair and Department of Gynaecological Oncology and Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Natalia GierulskaStudent's Scientific Association at the I Chair and Department of Gynaecological Oncology and Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Krzysztof KułakI Chair and Department of Gynaecological Oncology and Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Rafał TarkowskiI Chair and Department of Gynaecological Oncology and Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Ovarian cancer remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality among women because of its asymptomatic early course, delayed diagnosis, and frequent presentation at advanced stages. Germline and somatic mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes significantly increase the risk of ovarian cancer by impairing homologous recombination DNA repair, resulting in genomic instability. Beyond their role in carcinogenesis, BRCA mutations have become important prognostic and predictive biomarkers, influencing treatment response and clinical outcomes. This review summarizes current evidence regarding the impact of BRCA1/2 status on prognosis and therapeutic strategies in ovarian cancer. Methods: A literature review was conducted using the PubMed and Scopus databases. English-language articles published between 2016 and 2026 were identified using combinations of the keywords Results: The available evidence demonstrates that patients carrying BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations generally experience improved progression-free survival and, in many studies, prolonged overall survival compared with non-carriers. This survival advantage is largely attributed to increased sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy and the efficacy of PARP inhibitors, which exploit synthetic lethality in homologous recombination-deficient tumors. The literature also emphasizes the importance of universal BRCA testing to optimize treatment selection, identify candidates for maintenance PARP inhibitor therapy, and facilitate genetic counseling. In addition, emerging mechanisms of resistance to PARP inhibitors remain a significant therapeutic challenge. Conclusion: BRCA1/2 mutation status is a key biomarker in the management of ovarian cancer, supporting personalized treatment strategies and improving patient outcomes. Further research is needed to identify novel predictive biomarkers, overcome therapeutic resistance, and develop more effective targeted therapies.

Indexed as

BRCA1/2BRCA 1/2 mutationgenetic testingHRD (homologous recombination deficiency)ovarian cancerPARPiPARPi resistancetreatment

Identifiers

PMID42774753
PMCPMC13595197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.