ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2026
Mapping medication adherence interventions across Europe: Expert perspectives from 35 countries.
Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Medication adherence (MA) is a key challenge in healthcare. Literature about the real-world implementation of MA interventions across Europe remains poorly understood. This study aims to map MA interventions reported by experts across Europe. Study design: This cross-sectional study used a self-administered online survey targeting MA experts from 39 European countries. Experts were defined as professionals with clinical, policy, or research expertise in МА. Methods: Open-ended responses on expert-reported MA interventions were analysed using the framework method. The resulting categories were quantified at respondent level and described overall and by European region. Regional differences in the proportions of respondents reporting each intervention category were explored using exact tests, with adjustment for multiple comparisons. Results: A total of 140 MA experts from 35 European countries participated. Communication and education (83.6%) were the most frequently reported interventions, followed by follow-up and monitoring (53.6%), technological solutions (32.1%), and collaborative and multidisciplinary approaches (30.0%). Exploratory analyses identified regional differences in the reporting of collaborative and multidisciplinary approaches and technological solutions. Direct patient communication (35.0%) was the intervention most frequently perceived as successful by respondents and technological solutions were less frequently perceived as successful (12.9%). Conclusions: This study provides an expert-reported overview of MA interventions across European settings. Communication and education were the most frequently reported approaches, whereas technological and multidisciplinary interventions were reported less often. These findings support the need for further evaluation and more systematic integration of MA interventions across diverse European healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.