ArticleBehavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
Attraction to water and polarization in dragonflies and damselflies along a light pollution gradient.
Article in Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aquatic insects, like odonates, rely on polarized light as a visual cue to locate water bodies for reproduction. However, artificial polarization from light pollution can lead them into ecological traps. This study investigates odonate preference for polarized light cues compared with other sensory cues associated with water perception, and the effects of exposure to artificial polarization on their sensitivity to these cues. This study tests whether artificial polarization imposes a selective pressure that modifies odonate behavior and sensitivity to water and polarization signals. We predicted that odonate species in areas with higher light pollution would show a reduced preference for anthropogenic polarizing traps and an increased preference for natural water bodies. Our multiple-choice experiment revealed interspecific differences in cue attraction, with some species preferring polarizing traps while others favored water or color cues. Species attracted to the ecological light traps were always a subset of the total species present in each locality, indicating that most species are not attracted to ecological traps. Surprisingly, we found few significant differences in odonate behavior between polarization exposure categories, suggesting either weak selective pressure, prioritization of other sensory cues, or existing physiological-behavioral strategies that allowed them to avoid these ecological traps. We observed sex disparities in susceptibility to all experimental surfaces, with males showing greater attraction, potentially due to differences in habitat selection criteria. While evidence of strong selective pressure from light pollution is lacking, a reduction in light pollution near water bodies is needed to conserve odonates and aquatic insect populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.