Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42774743›Full record

ArticleBehavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Attraction to water and polarization in dragonflies and damselflies along a light pollution gradient.

Valentina Sandoval-Granillo, Angélica S Ensaldo-Cárdenas, Bruce A Robertson, Giovanna Villalobos-Jimenez, Alex Córdoba Aguilar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Valentina Sandoval-GranilloPosgrado en Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Av. Ciudad Universitaria 3000, Coyoacán, Mexico City 04510, Mexico.
Angélica S Ensaldo-CárdenasPosgrado en Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Av. Ciudad Universitaria 3000, Coyoacán, Mexico City 04510, Mexico.
Bruce A RobertsonBiology Program, Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson, NY 12504, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6101-1569
Giovanna Villalobos-JimenezCentro de Investigación en Ciencias de Información Geoespacial, Circuito Tecnopolo Norte, No. 107, Col. Tecnopolo Pocitos II, Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes 20313, Mexico.
Alex Córdoba AguilarInstituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apdo. Postal 70-275, Circuito Exterior, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, México City 04510, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5978-1660

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aquatic insects, like odonates, rely on polarized light as a visual cue to locate water bodies for reproduction. However, artificial polarization from light pollution can lead them into ecological traps. This study investigates odonate preference for polarized light cues compared with other sensory cues associated with water perception, and the effects of exposure to artificial polarization on their sensitivity to these cues. This study tests whether artificial polarization imposes a selective pressure that modifies odonate behavior and sensitivity to water and polarization signals. We predicted that odonate species in areas with higher light pollution would show a reduced preference for anthropogenic polarizing traps and an increased preference for natural water bodies. Our multiple-choice experiment revealed interspecific differences in cue attraction, with some species preferring polarizing traps while others favored water or color cues. Species attracted to the ecological light traps were always a subset of the total species present in each locality, indicating that most species are not attracted to ecological traps. Surprisingly, we found few significant differences in odonate behavior between polarization exposure categories, suggesting either weak selective pressure, prioritization of other sensory cues, or existing physiological-behavioral strategies that allowed them to avoid these ecological traps. We observed sex disparities in susceptibility to all experimental surfaces, with males showing greater attraction, potentially due to differences in habitat selection criteria. While evidence of strong selective pressure from light pollution is lacking, a reduction in light pollution near water bodies is needed to conserve odonates and aquatic insect populations.

Indexed as

aquatic insectsecological traplight pollution gradientodonatapolarized light pollutionwater perception

Identifiers

PMID42774743
PMCPMC13595255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.