ArticleAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2026
Prospective randomized clinical trial on comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation combined with individualized cognitive training in older adults with heart failure and mild cognitive impairment.
Article in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comment on "Prospective randomized clinical trial on comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation combined with individualized cognitive training in older adults with heart failure and mild cognitive impairment".American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Older adults with heart failure (HF) are vulnerable to physical and cognitive decline due to disease exacerbations and hospitalization. Although comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation (CCR) is currently a core component of HF care, randomized controlled trials involving hospitalized patients with acute HF remain limited, and cognitive assessment has not been the primary focus of previous trials. We designed a randomized controlled trial examining whether a multifactorial intervention integrating CCR with individualized cognitive training can prevent in-hospital cognitive decline in older adults with HF and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Methods: This is a single center, prospective, open-label, controlled superiority trial. Patients aged ≥65 yr who are hospitalized for HF, undergo CCR, and meet the criteria for MCI, defined by a Japanese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-J) score of 17-22, will be enrolled. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention group receiving CCR plus individualized cognitive training using BrainHQ or the control group receiving CCR alone. Cognitive training will be conducted for 20 min/day, 5 days/week, for at least 2 weeks. The primary endpoint is the change in MoCA-J score from baseline to discharge. Secondary endpoints include changes in self-care, anxiety/depression, and physical function, as well as unplanned readmissions and major cardiovascular events within 12 months after discharge. Conclusions: This trial will evaluate whether adding individualized cognitive training to CCR can prevent cognitive decline during hospitalization in patients with HF and MCI, providing evidence regarding the feasibility and potential value of this intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.