ArticleCurrent therapeutic research, clinical and experimental2026
Paclitaxel, carboplatin, and cetuximab induction chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective evaluation of treatment outcomes and safety.
Article in Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Purpose: Definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) has limitations in advanced disease. Paclitaxel, carboplatin, and cetuximab (PCE) offers a potentially safer induction chemotherapy alternative. This study evaluated the feasibility and outcomes of PCE induction followed by CRT compared with CRT alone among patients with Stage IV HNSCC who received definitive CRT. Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 128 patients with Stage IV HNSCC without distant metastases treated at a single institution (PCE group, n = 52; CRT group, n = 76). Survival analyses were restricted to the 127 patients who initiated definitive CRT, with time measured from CRT initiation to reduce immortal time bias; CRT completion was analyzed as an outcome, not an eligibility criterion. An adjusted Cox model accounted for baseline imbalances in T classification and Stage. Results: Median follow-up was 17.0 months (PCE) and 65.0 months (CRT). The PCE group had more advanced disease (T3-4: 90.4% vs. 65.8%; Stage IVB: 34.6% vs. 15.8%). PCE achieved an 82.7% response rate, CRT completion in 51 of 52 patients (98.1%), and significantly higher cisplatin ≥200 mg/m² achievement (86.5% vs. 59.2%, Conclusions: PCE induction was feasible, with a high rate of CRT completion and acceptable tolerability. PFS was longer in the PCE group after limited adjustment, whereas OS did not differ significantly. Given the retrospective, nonrandomized design, residual confounding, and shorter follow-up in the PCE group, these findings are hypothesis-generating and require confirmation in larger, prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.