Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42774668›Full record

ReviewAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2026

Maternal complete heart block in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Shabnam Kottummal, Varun Muppidi, Yavanasuriya Jeganathan, Deepthy M Sadanandan, Rohan D'Souza, Arun Keepanasseril, N Sreekumaran Nair, Anish Keepanasseril

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shabnam KottummalDepartments of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Jawaharlal Institute of Post-graduate Medical Education & Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India.
Varun MuppidiDepartments of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Jawaharlal Institute of Post-graduate Medical Education & Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India.
Yavanasuriya JeganathanDepartments of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Jawaharlal Institute of Post-graduate Medical Education & Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India.
Deepthy M SadanandanBiostatistics, Jawaharlal Institute of Post-graduate Medical Education & Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India.
Rohan D'SouzaDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Arun KeepanasserilDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
N Sreekumaran NairBiostatistics, Jawaharlal Institute of Post-graduate Medical Education & Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India.
Anish KeepanasserilDepartments of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Jawaharlal Institute of Post-graduate Medical Education & Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Complete heart block (CHB) is an uncommon bradyarrhythmia complicating pregnancy, posing challenges to the treating team. Objective: To evaluate the maternal outcomes, other cardiac complications, and pregnancy outcomes among pregnant women with CHB and compare these outcomes among those managed with and without pacing. Methods: We searched two databases, i.e., MEDLINE and EMBASE, for studies reporting outcomes in pregnancies complicated by CHB. The bibliography of relevant articles was examined to identify additional articles. Maternal and perinatal outcomes, including obstetric and cardiac complications, were extracted. Using the random-effects model, pooled estimates of various outcomes are reported as percentages with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: A total of 294 pregnancies among 220 women with CHB, identified from 12 studies, were included in the analysis. Two-thirds had either temporary or permanent pacing during pregnancy. Arrhythmias other than CHB were the most common cardiac complications noted (2.7%, 95% CI: 0.9%-4.5%). Lead-related complications, such as lead migration (1.6%, 95% CI: 0.1%-3.0%), were uncommon. One maternal death was reported among the included studies, during the postpartum period in an asymptomatic mother who did not have pacing. Low birth weight was the most common complication (43.1%, 95% CI: 17% - 67%) in the studies reporting neonatal outcomes. Conclusion: Pregnancies complicated with CHB have low rates of adverse maternal and fetal/neonatal outcomes under multidisciplinary care. The outcomes were similar among those with and without pacemakers, suggesting that women can cope with the physiological changes of pregnancy even without pacing.

Indexed as

Cardiac pacemakerComplete heart blockLead-related complicationsLow birth weightPregnancyTemporary cardiac pacing

Identifiers

PMID42774668
PMCPMC13595158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.