ArticleCyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.)2026
A Bioinspired Perceptual Sensor for Spatiotemporal Decoding of Haptic and Pain Stimuli in Prostheses.
Article in Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Phantom limb pain, a common sequela in lower-limb amputees, impairs their ability to accurately perceive and distinguish between haptic and pain sensations, thereby hindering residual limb function and reducing rehabilitation efficacy. Although existing prosthetic technologies seek to restore sensory function, they often fail to provide real-time localization of haptic stimuli and effectively integrate pain feedback, resulting in an inability to deliver cohesive tactile and nociceptive cues. Here, we present a bioinspired perceptual sensor (BPS) capable of spatiotemporally decoding haptic and pain information by integrating artificial mechanoreceptors with synaptic transistors. High sensing performance and synaptic plasticity of the BPS enable the localization and intensity assessment of haptic stimuli, along with the spatiotemporal integration of pain feedback, facilitating the quantitative evaluation of synergistic haptic and pain perception. We first validated our BPS by integrating it into a humanoid robotic system and demonstrated its ability to distinguish and respond to environment-responsive conditioned and unconditioned reflexes in a closed-loop manner. Then, the sensing platform was incorporated into the prosthetic socket interface for amputees, and its capability to provide accurate, reliable haptic and pain feedback was confirmed, thereby offering crucial insights for optimizing prosthetic fit, limb health, and functional rehabilitation outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.