ArticleBJA open2026
Real-world activities of clinician-researchers in perioperative medicine: an ethnographic qualitative case study embedded in a single-centre clinical trial.
Article in BJA open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04436016 (Effect of Heart Rate Control With Ivabradine on Myocardial Injury After Non-cardiac Surgery), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of Heart Rate Control With Ivabradine on Myocardial Injury After Non-cardiac Surgery: a Single Center, Randomized Controlled, Double-blind Feasibility Pilot Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clinician-researchers play a key role in bridging clinical care and research, yet their day-to-day activities remain poorly described. This study aimed to characterise the range of activities undertaken by clinician-researchers in a perioperative clinical trial and explore how these activities are experienced by patient-participants. Methods: We conducted an ethnographic qualitative case study embedded in an RCT in a tertiary hospital. In phase 1, clinician-researchers (physicians and nurses) were observed Results: The study was conducted between October and November 2021 and included observation of seven clinician-researchers and eight patient-participants. Clinician-researchers engaged in a variety of activities extending past traditional research tasks. Time spent on supportive tasks was nearly three times as much as that spent on core RCT activities, with many tasks occurring before or after primary research procedures. Non-RCT activities accounted for one-third of observed time. Patient-participants reported that interactions with clinician-researchers contributed to their perioperative experience, particularly through (1) alleviation of boredom and (2) provision of a perceived sense of safety. Conclusions: Clinician-researchers undertook a wide range of activities that extended beyond protocol-driven research tasks encompassing significant coordination and relational work. These activities were perceived by patient-participants to positively influence their perioperative experience in this specific context. These findings highlight the importance of considering the full scope of clinician-researchers' work when designing and implementing prospective clinical trials. Clinical trial registration: NCT04436016.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.