ArticleiScience2026
Q-AVOA-net: A multi-domain, quantum-inspired feature-selection and deep-fuzzy framework for interpretable white blood cell classification.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable white blood cell (WBC) classification from peripheral blood smear microscopy is hindered by stain variability, domain shift, class imbalance, and limited interpretability. We propose Q-AVOA-Net, a multi-domain and clinician-oriented framework integrating Enhanced Contourlet Transform and a Learnable Gabor Filter Bank for structure-texture encoding, Bi-LSTM attention for dependency modeling, Q-AVOA for multi-objective feature selection, and an interpretable fuzzy decision layer that outputs class-wise membership evidence. Evaluated on Raabin-WBC, LISC, and BCCD with cross-dataset and robustness testing, Q-AVOA-Net achieves 97.2 ± 0.2% accuracy on the integrated evaluation framework (AUC 0.988) and improves confidence reliability (ECE 0.018). The selected representation is compact (1280 features) while maintaining efficient inference (20.7 ms/image). Together, these results support robust, calibrated, and interpretable WBC classification for microscopy-based decision support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.