ArticleHeart rhythm O22026
Sinus-rhythm conduction phenotyping using vector-flow mapping in first-time atrial fibrillation ablation: Associations with structural remodeling and thromboembolic risk.
Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pulmonary vein isolation achieves success in 60%-80% of first ablation procedures. Sinus-rhythm vector-flow mapping (COHERENT module) may enable phenotype-guided ablation. Objective: This study aimed to classify sinus-rhythm conduction phenotypes using COHERENT mapping and assess associations with atrial remodeling, recurrence, and thromboembolic risk. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 80 consecutive patients (mean age 65.1 ± 12.5 years; 32.5% persistent atrial fibrillation [AF]) undergoing initial AF ablation with high-density sinus-rhythm mapping. 5 phenotypes were defined: normal flow, conduction delay, congested flow, disrupted flow, and Bachmann's bundle split (BBS). Patients were grouped into 8 mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive phenotype-burden categories (normal, 4 single-phenotype groups, double, triple, quadruple). Outcomes were assessed by unadjusted logistic regression with normal as the reference; all 80 patients completed 24-month follow-up. Results: Phenotype-burden categories showed gradients in structural and AF-related markers. Each 10 mL/m Conclusion: Sinus-rhythm COHERENT mapping delineated distinct conduction phenotypes associated with progressive atrial structural remodeling. Phenotype burden defined a graded atrial cardiomyopathy continuum, with double showing the highest 24-month recurrence. BBS only and quadruple shared borderline thromboembolic signals via distinct mechanisms. These findings provide mechanistic insight into atrial cardiomyopathy and generate hypotheses for substrate-guided ablation and thromboembolic-risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.