ArticleHeart rhythm O22026
Automatic measurement of short-term variability of repolarization on human intracardiac electrograms predicts VT/VF events.
Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) have proven highly effective in reducing sudden cardiac death by terminating life-threatening arrhythmias. However, their reactive nature underscores the need for preventive strategies to further improve patient outcomes. Short-term variability (STV) of repolarization has emerged as a promising predictive marker for ventricular arrhythmias. Despite its potential, the feasibility of implementing STV monitoring in real-world ICD settings remains uncertain owing to challenges such as noise, abnormal depolarizations, and device-specific constraints. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of STV monitoring in clinical practice using anonymized electrogram recordings from Medtronic Cobalt/Crome ICD and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator devices. Methods: The dataset includes 636 monomorphic ventricular tachycardia episodes, 107 ventricular fibrillation events, and 6000 baseline recordings. Cardiac beats with abnormal repolarization patterns or noise were excluded to ensure reliable STV estimation. STV values were then compared within individuals (baseline vs arrhythmic events) and across groups (patients with and without arrhythmic events). Results: STV values were significantly elevated before arrhythmic events compared with baseline 5.8 ms (interquartile range, 3.3-7.6) vs 4.3 ms (interquartile range, 2.8-7.6) ( Conclusion: This study supports the role of STV as a marker for arrhythmic risk, evidenced by significant elevations in STV preceding arrhythmic events. It also emphasizes the importance of signal preprocessing to mitigate confounding factors and enhance the predictive accuracy of the STV parameter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.