ArticleClinical case reports2026
Preservation of the Posterior Meningeal Artery During Excision of a Foramen Magnum Meningioma: A Case Report.
Article in Clinical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 56-year-old woman presented with a foramen magnum meningioma associated with headache and left hypoglossal nerve palsy. A vessel arising from the intradural vertebral artery was identified as the posterior meningeal artery based on an integrated assessment of its origin, course, and relationship to the tumor on three-dimensional angiography and at surgery. During temporary occlusion, the left abductor pollicis brevis motor-evoked potential (MEP) was present at 8 min and absent at 9 min. It was again detectable in the recording obtained 7 min after clip release, but subsequent responses were not consistently discernible. Stimulation intensity had been increased after signal loss, and dissection continued during occlusion, limiting attribution of the MEP changes to vessel occlusion or release. The vessel was preserved, and Simpson Grade IV resection was performed. Histomorphology supported meningothelial meningioma, CNS WHO Grade 1; the Ki-67 labeling index was 1%. This case illustrates vessel-preservation decisions informed by anatomical correlation and repeated neurophysiological assessment when vascular function is uncertain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.