ArticleJournal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty2026
Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures as an outpatient procedure.
Article in Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study is to compare short-term outcomes, including complication rates, readmissions, and reoperations, between inpatient and outpatient reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) performed for proximal humerus fractures. Methods: All rTSA performed for proximal humerus fractures from January 2020 to January 2025 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were evaluated based on whether they had the surgery performed as an inpatient (at least 1 overnight hospital stay) or as an outpatient (discharged on the same day as surgery). The decision for inpatient versus outpatient surgery was based on the surgeon's discretion. Complications within the first 30 and 90 days, including readmission and reoperation, were compared between the 2 groups, and a Results: A total of 131 rTSAs for proximal humerus fractures were performed during the study period. Fifty-four patients underwent outpatient surgery and 77 patients underwent inpatient surgery. Average age in the outpatient group was 72.0 ± 6.8 years compared to inpatient 75.1 ± 9.7 years ( Conclusion: rTSA for proximal humerus fractures can be safely performed in the outpatient setting for appropriately selected patients, with no significant differences in 30-day or 90-day ED visits, readmission, or reoperations compared to inpatient management. Careful patient selection, incorporating medical and social factors, may allow for expanded use of outpatient pathways while maintaining patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.