Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42774516›Full record

ArticleJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2026

Cadaveric study on feasibility of elbow joint denervation through a single posterior incision.

Esmee Kwee, J Michiel Zuidam, Jan Debeij, Roger van Riet, Joost Colaris, Denise Eygendaal, Caroline A Hundepool

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Esmee KweeDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive Surgery and Handsurgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Michiel ZuidamDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive Surgery and Handsurgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan DebeijDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Hand, Wrist and Elbow Unit, Haga Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Roger van RietDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, AZ Monica, Antwerp, Belgium.
Joost ColarisDepartment of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Denise EygendaalDepartment of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Caroline A HundepoolDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive Surgery and Handsurgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Treatment options for painful elbow osteoarthritis are limited. When a conservative therapy and débridement fail, total elbow arthroplasty remains the only salvage procedure. However, it is costly, highly invasive, and unsuitable for younger, active patients because of strict activity restrictions and limited prosthesis longevity. While denervation is a well-established intervention for hand and wrist osteoarthritis, its application in the elbow remains underexplored. This cadaveric study assesses the accessibility of elbow joint articular branches (ABs) through a single posterior incision. Methods: Ten fresh-frozen upper extremities were dissected via a standardized 20-cm posterior midline incision. Eight nerves were targeted: the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve, ulnar, ulnar collateral, median, posterior antebrachial cutaneous nerve, radial, radial collateral, and musculocutaneous nerve. For each nerve, accessibility, number of ABs, and distance from the corresponding epicondyle were recorded. Results: All 8 nerves and their ABs were successfully accessed in all 10 specimens. Medial nerves include the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve (mean 1.3 ABs; 4.8 cm from medial epicondyle), ulnar nerve (1.3 ABs; 1.6 cm), ulnar collateral nerve (7.4 cm), and median nerve (1.2 ABs; 2.0 cm). Lateral nerves include the posterior antebrachial cutaneous nerve (1.8 cm from lateral epicondyle), radial nerve (1.4 ABs; 6.4 cm), radial collateral nerve (7.0 cm), and musculocutaneous nerve (1.0 AB; 1.2 cm). Conclusion: A single-incision posterior approach provides consistent access to all key nerves innervating the elbow joint. These findings demonstrate the anatomic feasibility of elbow denervation, while preserving the option for a future reconstructive surgery through the same incision.

Indexed as

Articular branchesCadaveric studyDenervationElbow jointJoint innervationOsteoarthritis

Identifiers

PMID42774516
PMCPMC13594733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.