Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42774468›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2026

Comparative Evaluation of Citric Acid, Chlorhexidine, and Their Combination as Root Canal Irrigants on the Push-Out Bond Strength of Resin and Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers to Root Canal Dentin.

Laasya Shettigar, Tina Puthen Purayil, Kishore Ginjupalli, Nidambur Vasudev Ballal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laasya ShettigarDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India, manipal.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9964-7749
Tina Puthen PurayilDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India, manipal.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7605-1838
Kishore GinjupalliDepartment of Dental Materials, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India, manipal.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1824-2054
Nidambur Vasudev BallalDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India, manipal.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2208-9443

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Root canal irrigants can alter root canal dentin and influence sealer adhesion. With increasing use of bioceramic sealers, understanding the effects of irrigants on bonding is essential for endodontic success. This in vitro study evaluated the effects of 1% chlorhexidine (CHX), 10% citric acid (CA), and their combination (CACHX) on the push-out bond strength (POBS) of AH Plus and BioRoot RCS to root canal dentin. Methods: Eighty single-rooted premolars with a single canal were selected and divided into eight groups ( Results: The final irrigant significantly affected bond strength ( Conclusion: In this in vitro study, root canal irrigants significantly influenced sealer bond strength. AH Plus exhibited the highest bond strength with CHX, whereas BioRoot RCS performed best with CA. The combination of CA and CHX did not adversely affect AH Plus and may be considered a suitable irrigant protocol for this sealer.

Identifiers

PMID42774468
PMCPMC13594557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.