ArticleHeart rhythm O22026
The flexibility of delayed fluoroscopic left ventricular angiography in periprocedural real-time visualization of the lead tip in left bundle branch pacing.
Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Current electrocardiography and electrogram (EGM) criteria for confirming left bundle branch (LBB) capture may be inconclusive in certain clinical scenarios. Real-time imaging methods to evaluate lead positioning during LBB pacing (LBBP) remain limited. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of delayed fluoroscopic left ventricular (LV) angiography (LVG) for real-time visualization of lead position during LBBP. Methods: Patients undergoing LBB area pacing with delayed LVG were classified as LBBP or LV septal pacing (LVSP) according to EGM-based capture criteria. LBB capture was identified by fascicular potentials, morphology transitions, or a stepwise electrocardiography/EGM algorithm; lead tip-to-LV and right ventricular septal border distances were measured at end-systole and end-diastole, with right ventricular distance representing total lead insertion length. Results: 76 patients were included (LBBP n = 51; LVSP n = 25). Pacing threshold, impedance, R-wave amplitude, and stimulus-to-V6 LV activation time did not differ significantly between the groups. The QRS onset to V6 LV activation time was shorter in the LBBP group than the LVSP group (33.3 ± 10.6 ms vs 41.4 ± 12.9 ms; Conclusion: Delayed LVG provides a practical intraprocedural imaging method as an adjunct for real-time visualization of lead position during LBBP, particularly when capture criteria are uncertain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.