ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Establishing the behavioral feasibility of a structured story-generation paradigm for neurophysiological research.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Historically, many standard measures evaluate creativity at a single time point and are not suitable for capturing the continuous neural activity underlying naturalistic, creative cognition. The aims of our study were to: (a) establish the feasibility of a behavioral paradigm suitable for investigating the continuous, temporal dynamics of creative cognition using neurophysiological methods, and (b) evaluate the feasibility of using large language models (LLMs) for scoring. Sixty undergraduate students (M age = 21.65 years; M/F = 50%) wrote a brief story integrating three unrelated images into a single narrative. Each story was scored by two large LLMs. The ICC(2,1) for total story scores was 0.67 (95% CI [0.51, 0.79]), indicating moderate agreement between models and were averaged into a composite score. The story task produced a broad distribution of scores (M = 9.2, SD = 2.1; range = 4.5-12.5) supporting its ability to generate variable creative output. We compared the total story creativity score to the Inventory of Creative Activities and Achievements (ICAA) and the Divergent Association Task (DAT). There were no significant correlations with ICAA or DAT scores. A random subset (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.