ArticleAmerican journal of lifestyle medicine2026
Are Midlife Australians Ready to Implement Lifestyle Medicine to Improve Their Health and Wellbeing? A Cross-Sectional Online Survey.
Article in American journal of lifestyle medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study assessed awareness, acceptability, and readiness to use Lifestyle Medicine (LM) among Australians in midlife (40-65 years). A cross-sectional online survey of Australian adults aged 40-65 years (n = 357) measured awareness and understanding of LM, willingness to use LM for prevention and after diagnosis, barriers to engagement, preferences for support, and readiness to discuss lifestyle change with a health professional. The survey included closed-response items and five open-ended questions. Awareness of the term LM was moderate (56%) and understanding was uneven, with many definitions emphasizing nutrition and exercise. LM was more acceptable for prevention (89.6% agreement) than after a new diagnosis (77%). Most participants supported discussing LM during routine health checks (75%) and valued personalized advice (85%). Readiness to discuss lifestyle change with a health professional was positive for 61%, while 31% were unsure. Qualitative findings highlighted the importance of timing, trust in clinicians, practical constraints, and ongoing support. Overall, midlife Australians reported strong acceptability of LM, particularly for prevention, but variable awareness and common practical barriers indicate a gap between endorsement and intended action. The findings support further evaluation of brief, personalized LM discussions and scalable follow-up pathways in routine care to determine whether these approaches can improve engagement and help close the knowing-to-doing gap.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.