ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
LLM and CQL computable phenotypes for myocarditis adverse event feature and outcome determinations using patient FHIR data: a feasibility study.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Post-market surveillance for adverse events of special interest is often constrained by key diagnostic elements being captured primarily in unstructured clinical notes and reports. This feasibility study evaluated large language model (LLM) and clinical quality language (CQL) methodologies to perform phenotype feature extraction and outcome determination on Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) data. Methods: Two health systems identified patients with an mRNA COVID-19 vaccination and an inpatient myocarditis diagnosis within 42 days. Patient FHIR data was retrieved via a Health Information Exchange and converted into narrative text ("textified"). Llama3.3 70B Instruct answered yes/no Brighton Collaborative-based myocarditis feature questions; answers were written back as FHIR Observation resources to enhance each patient bundle. Three methods were compared: simple CQL (structured data only), LLM (textified FHIR data), and enhanced CQL (CQL on enhanced bundles). Three clinicians provided gold-standard determinations. An optimization set ( Results: In the test set, simple CQL performed poorly for identifying cardiac and non-specific symptoms [Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC): 0.08; F1: 0.02] but excellently for cardiac biomarkers (MCC:0.83; F1: 0.88). The LLM achieved excellent performance identifying symptoms and imaging features (e.g., echocardiogram abnormalities MCC: 0.86) but weaker performance for biomarkers (MCC: 0.54). Enhanced CQL had excellent feature identification performance across most domains. Both LLM and enhanced CQL correctly determined the myocarditis outcome for 23 of 25 patients. Conclusions: In this small feasibility study, structured and unstructured FHIR data provided the computable phenotypes using an LLM with sufficient clinical information for myocarditis feature identification and outcome determination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.