ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Usability, adherence and efficacy of coach-augmented dHealth cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia in South African sexual assault survivors: a pilot study.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Treating sleep difficulties - a core symptom of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) - can improve both sleep and broader psychiatric outcomes. Digital health (dHealth) applications offer a scalable way to deliver cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-i), particularly for trauma survivors facing barriers to care. However, adherence to these interventions is often poor and may be improved through human support, especially for more demanding components such as sleep rescheduling. This study evaluated the usability, adherence, and preliminary efficacy of a dHealth application delivering sleep rescheduling both with and without coach support, alongside self-guided stimulus control and sleep hygiene components. Methods: Female sexual assault survivors were assigned to one of two groups comparing the sleep rescheduling component of the dHealth application: either coach-assisted (n = 27) or self-guided (n = 27). All participants received stimulus control and sleep hygiene information embedded in the application, in the form of a newsletter, including a third comparator group (n = 25), which received this information only. Usability and negative effects were self-reported. Adherence was assessed via dropout rates, application engagement, newsletter openings, and compliance with sleep prescriptions. Efficacy was measured by changes in insomnia, depressive, and PTSD symptoms. Results: The self-guided group reported lower satisfaction and more negative effects than controls. Compared to the self-guided group, coach-assisted participants showed better adherence to sleep prescriptions. Across groups, insomnia and depressive symptoms decreased significantly. Preliminary evaluation of efficacy showed that PTSD symptoms improved substantially in the coach-assisted and comparator groups, while improvements in the self-guided group plateaued after initial gains. Discussion: Unguided application use was associated with poorer usability, greater negative effects, lower adherence, and some potential weaker outcomes. Preliminary findings suggest that sleep rescheduling may benefit from human support to be effective. Where coaching is unavailable, simple stimulus control and sleep hygiene education may be preferable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.