ArticleImmunotherapy advances2026
ImmTACs overcome cytotoxic T cell suppression.
Article in Immunotherapy advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Synthetic T cell receptor (TCR) engagers are cancer therapeutics that activate T cells through recognition of antigens on the tumor cell surface. Immune-mobilizing monoclonal TCRs against cancer (ImmTAC) are composed of the extracellular domains of the alpha and beta chains of an affinity-enhanced TCR recognizing a tumor-associated antigenic peptide-major histocompatibility complex (MHC) complex linked to an scFv fragment of an antibody against CD3ε. A first-in-class ImmTAC, Tebentafusp, is approved for the treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma. Here we asked how ImmTACs activate human primary cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) in response to antigen-presenting tumor target cells. Materials and methods: We used a recently established experimental strategy to generate active and matched suppressed CTL Results: ImmTACs could elicit tumor cell cytolysis in response to endogenous antigen presentation by both active and suppressed CTL, but much less so for IFNγ secretion, in a manner dependent on the engager affinity for CD3ε. ImmTACs did so by enhancing the efficient execution of subcellular CTL polarization steps required for effective cytolysis and could trigger calcium signaling. Conclusion: These data establish that ImmTACs are powerful inducers of CTL cytotoxicity and do so with a comparable efficacy and mechanism as direct engagement of a TCR by peptide-MHC. ImmTACs retain this capability under suppressive conditions comparable to those in the tumor microenvironment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.