ArticleTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2026
The perfused liver utilisation study (PLUS): challenges and innovation in the evaluation of an emerging technology.
Article in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous studies suggest that donor liver normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) reduces injury and enables functional assessment, resulting in an increase in utilisation. The PLUS study was designed to assess the impact of NMP availability on utilisation of livers at high risk of non-use. Using a threshold-crossing design, functional utilisation was assessed in a real-world retrospective registry-based control cohort. A predetermined efficacy threshold was set, and a prospective cohort was recruited in all UK liver transplant centres with NMP made available for all livers at high risk of non-utilisation. Availability of NMP resulted in a significant increase in functional utilisation (OR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.04-1.53), but this did not exceed the pre-determined efficacy threshold. The threshold was exceeded in the subgroup of donation after circulatory death (DCD) livers, although this increase was reduced with adjustment for the use of normothermic regional perfusion. NMP was used in only 31% of retrieved livers, with variation between centres. The benefit of having NMP available was less than anticipated, likely due to low use in some centres associated with staff availability. Provision of NMP as a service, or centralisation of NMP use in assessment and recovery centres, may improve uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.