Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42774232›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2026

From cognitive overload to institutional escalation: formalizing the supply-demand production condition in patient-safety failure.

Yngve Mikkelsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yngve MikkelsenIndependent Researcher, Jar, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physician exit, unit closures, and regulatory interventions are conventionally treated as separate workforce and governance problems. The workload-patient safety literature documents the empirical relationship between system strain and deterioration in outcomes; the agency literature describes the information asymmetry governing physician behavior; the organizational safety science literature describes how systems drift toward failure under production pressure. What remains insufficiently specified is a formal account of the production conditions that may connect these literatures, and a candidate mechanism through which institutionally determined cognitive demands may translate, via physician decision-making, into outcome deterioration, recursive self-amplification, and observable institutional escalation. This paper offers a formal conceptual specification of that proposed mechanism. We represent clinical outcome quality as a function of the ratio of effective cognitive supply to cognitive demand: O = f(S/D), where S = I · f(WM, e,

Indexed as

agency theorycognitive loadeffort-accuracy trade-offhealth system governanceinstitutional escalationpatient safetyphysician burnoutphysician workforce

Identifiers

PMID42774232
PMCPMC13593859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.