Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42774175›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2026

Personalized robotic interventions for apathy in dementia: the RAPHAel trial.

Claudia Casadio, Vanessa Zanelli, Valentina Bettelli, Francesco Ricci, Lucrezia Grassi, Pietro Benvenuti, Erika Rovini, Giulia Smecca, Sara Isernia, Simone Salemme and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Claudia Casadio *Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Vanessa Zanelli *Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Valentina BettelliDepartment of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Francesco RicciDepartment of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Lucrezia GrassiDepartment of Computer Science, Bioengineering, Robotics and Systems Engineering University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Pietro BenvenutiDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Erika RoviniDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Giulia SmeccaFondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETS of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Sara IserniaFondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETS of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Simone SalemmeDepartment of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Manuela TondelliDepartment of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Annalisa ChiariUniversity Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Francesca BaglioFondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETS of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Filippo CavalloDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Fausta LuiDepartment of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Francesca BenuzziDepartment of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Laura FioriniDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Antonio SgorbissaDepartment of Computer Science, Bioengineering, Robotics and Systems Engineering University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Giovanna ZamboniDepartment of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Apathy is common in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia and mild behavioral impairment (MBI), and is associated with reduced quality of life and increased caregiver burden. Home-based robot-assisted interventions offer a novel approach for cognitive stimulation and behavioral management, but robust evidence on feasibility, acceptability, and clinical impact is limited. Objectives: To evaluate the effects of home-based robotic interventions on the level of apathy in individuals with cognitive decline, including MCI, MBI, and dementia. Secondary objectives are to assess the usability of the robotic devices and the extent of patients' interactions with and through these technologies, as well as to evaluate the effects of the robotic interventions on caregivers' stress levels and quality of life. Methods: This single-blind, randomized controlled trial includes three arms: two experimental robot-assisted interventions (tele-operated cognitive stimulation and humanoid robot) and an active control group receiving occupational therapy, which represents the current gold-standard intervention. Eighty patients with MCI, MBI, or dementia, and clinically significant apathy, together with their study partners, will be recruited from neurology, geriatrics, and neurorehabilitation centers in Italy. Each intervention will last 6 weeks. Assessments will be performed at baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1), and follow-up (T2) and will include clinical questionnaires, cognitive and social cognition tasks, and sensor-based measures of social grasping. Conclusion: This study will provide evidence on the potential clinical benefits, feasibility, and acceptability of home-based robot-assisted interventions for apathy in cognitive decline, as well as inform the development of digital markers for personalized monitoring and intervention.

Indexed as

apathydementiaMCImild cognitive impairmentrobotic interventiontelerehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID42774175
PMCPMC13593512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.