Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42774171›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Psychological assessments predict insider threat risk-mitigation measures, but only marginally.

Kristoffer Lilja-Lolax, Charlotte Alm, Stefan Annell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kristoffer Lilja-LolaxDepartment of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Charlotte AlmDepartment of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Stefan AnnellDepartment of Leadership and Command & Control, Swedish Defence University, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insider threat actions are often linked to individual psychological characteristics, yet the predictive utility of assessing such characteristics within operational personnel security frameworks remains unclear. The present study examined whether demographic and psychological assessment variables from the Swedish military selection process were associated with subsequent personnel security investigations resulting in adjudicative decisions within the Swedish Armed Forces. Data linked selection assessments conducted between 2010 and 2017 to 650 adjudicated investigation cases recorded between 2010 and 2023. Psychological measures included cognitive ability scores and interview-based ratings of psychological functioning and suitability for command. Separate logistic regression analyses compared two control samples with cases involving pre-existing antecedents, which were present at the time of assessment, and emergent antecedents, which arose later during service. Age at assessment and sex showed the strongest association with adjudicated investigations, whereas the psychological assessments showed weaker and less stable associations. Multivariate models demonstrated modest explanatory power, with pseudo-

Indexed as

insider threatmilitary personnelmilitary selectionpersonnel securitypsychological assessmentsrisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID42774171
PMCPMC13593516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.