ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
AI-driven virtual standardized patients combined with scenario-based simulation in anesthesiology training: a randomized pilot study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anesthesiology trainees require repeated opportunities to practice perioperative crisis recognition, decision-making, communication and teamwork, which are central to crisis resource management (CRM) and non-technical skills. High-fidelity simulation supports these competencies but is resource intensive to deliver repeatedly. AI-driven virtual standardized patients (AI-VSPs) may complement simulation and structured debriefing by enabling interactive practice and feedback. Methods: We conducted a prospective, randomized, three-arm pilot study among 60 students enrolled in a professional master's degree program in anesthesiology at Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University between January and June 2026. Participants were assigned to conventional teaching (group A, Results: All participants completed the study and were analyzed. No statistically significant between-group differences were detected in the reported baseline characteristics. In participant-level post-intervention analyses, total simulated clinical performance was higher in group C than in groups A and B (88.2 ± 4.8 vs. 78.0 ± 7.7 and 80.4 ± 6.5; F(2, 57) = 13.72, Conclusions: A time-matched pathway in which AI-VSP practice replaced part of conventional case discussion while simulation and structured debriefing were retained was associated with better short-term performance on aligned anesthesiology crisis tasks. These findings support the feasibility of this approach and suggest potential benefits in selected CRM-relevant domains, but do not establish comprehensive CRM competence, definitive effectiveness or durable transfer to clinical practice. Larger multicenter studies with prespecified analyses, detailed reporting of AI-system characteristics, delayed assessment and workplace-based outcomes are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.