ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Allostatic load as a framework for understanding early-onset colorectal cancer: current biomarker evidence and future directions.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Colorectal cancer incidence rates have been on the decline over the past 50 years due to increased screening and diagnostic tools. Over the past 32 years (since 1994), there has been a rise in colorectal cancer for those under 50 years old. This trend has been designated as early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) and is in direct opposition to the decline seen in those over 50 years of age; designated as late onset colorectal cancer (LOCRC). The rise in EOCRC has been attributed to various factors such as environmental, modern diet and lifestyle. Methods: The paper includes a comprehensive search of both cohort and case-control studies that were designed to investigate the association between EOCRC and allostatic load (AL) using two databases: MEDLINE PubMed and Stony Brook University Libraries Database. Results: 12 studies were included in this paper. These papers varied on how many used biomarkers that are measured in allostatic load. Out of the 12 studies, only 3 had direct measurements of AL such as metabolic and cardiovascular, 9 measured indirect biomarkers such as inflammatory pathways and epigenetics. Conclusion: The purpose of this paper is to change the current paradigm focus of the causation of EOCRC being associated with a single factor and instead study factors together using allostatic load. Although none of the papers measured AL and EOCRC directly, they each used a direct or indirect measurement of AL when studying EOCRC. We believe that AL should be the next focus for future research of EOCRC to better understand how all these factors contribute to disease progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.