ArticleJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions2026
A Multicenter, Mixed Methods Study of United States Heart Teams and Health Policy: The EVOLVE Study Design and Protocol.
Article in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The management of patients with aortic stenosis is rapidly evolving, along with the "heart team," a multidisciplinary group collaborating in program management. There is scant research providing rigorous data on the variability in heart teams' approach to optimal patient care delivery. This investigation aimed to describe the current health care delivery strategies and attitudes of contemporary heart teams at diverse hospitals across the United States and provide key insight into future health policy and guideline directions. Methods: We will conduct a convergent parallel design mixed methods study integrating quantitative (survey) and qualitative (semistructured interviews, coded using qualitative research software) data to develop a deeper understanding of heart valve team roles, functions, health care delivery strategies, and clinician perceptions of the impacts of health policy mandates on team and patient experience. Guided by a grounded theory approach, we will generate themes inductively from perspectives expressed by the participants. Heart valve teams will be recruited until saturation of themes and to maximize variation in practice settings (academic status, geographical location, transcatheter aortic valve replacement program volume, program tenure). We anticipate 8 to 20 programs and 40 to 100 participants. This study is approved by the Western Copernicus Group Institutional Review Board and adheres to Good Reporting of a Mixed Methods Study guidelines for mixed methods research. Conclusions: This study is designed to be the largest investigation to date of United States heart teams focused on aortic stenosis, aimed to inform health policy and guideline efforts to streamline care, address continued inequities and undertreatment, and optimize patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.