ArticleScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports2026
The Influence of Running Cadence Manipulation on Acute Cartilage Response in Distance Runners.
Article in Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We examined the influence of running cadence manipulation on femoral cartilage deformation in runners and assessed the association between knee biomechanics and cartilage characteristics. Thirty-one runners (15 females and 16 males) completed a habitual and high cadence (+10%) run 2-7 days apart in a counterbalanced order. Participants underwent ultrasound imaging of their femoral trochlear cartilage before and after running. A force instrumented treadmill with an 8-camera motion capture system obtained the peak knee flexion angle, peak knee extensor moment, peak patellofemoral joint force (PFJF), peak patellofemoral joint stress (PFJS), and cumulative PFJS. A 2 (condition) by 2 (time) ANOVA with repeated measures revealed medial cartilage thickness decreased similarly between conditions after running (1.97 (95% CI: 1.86, 2.09) vs. 1.89 (95% CI: 1.78, 2.01) mm; mean difference = -0.078 (95% CI: -0.130, -0.026) mm, p = 0.005). No main effect of condition or interaction effect was found despite a difference between biomechanics outcomes (all p < 0.001). Higher peak and cumulative PFJS were associated with a greater decrease in medial cartilage thickness following high cadence running (p = 0.011). Higher PFJS was associated with thicker medial, central, and lateral cartilage thickness (all p < 0.05). Increasing running cadence may be a viable intervention to decrease external joint loading while maintaining an internal stimulus to knee cartilage. Cartilage is avascular and relies on mechanical loading to facilitate nutrient diffusion. As such, joint stress during running may be beneficial for cartilage development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.