ArticlePsychophysiology2026
Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation at Olfactory Bulb-Relevant Frequencies Modulates Human Olfactory Function.
Article in Psychophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) is a noninvasive technique that engages central neuromodulatory pathways and has been shown to modulate sensory processing across multiple modalities. Here, we investigated whether tVNS influences human olfactory perception. Sixty-seven healthy adults were assigned to one of two stimulation frequency groups, 25 Hz (beta) or 55 Hz (gamma), and each received 20 min of tVNS applied to the left cymba concha as well as a control condition with identical stimulation delivered to the left earlobe. Odor discrimination, odor intensity, and visual attention were assessed before and after stimulation. Gamma frequency tVNS significantly decreased odor discrimination performance, whereas beta frequency did not. Odor intensity ratings increased modestly following stimulation in both groups, with a stronger effect observed after gamma-frequency tVNS. There were no changes in visual attention, and the stimulation intensity, which was selected by the participant, was not associated with olfactory outcomes. These findings demonstrate that tVNS can modulate human olfactory processing in a frequency-dependent manner. The selective effect of gamma frequency, that is, the known processing frequency of the human olfactory bulb, implies inhibitory interneuron engagement in the olfactory bulb. These findings demonstrate that noninvasive tVNS can modulate human olfactory processing in a frequency-specific manner and highlight stimulation frequency as a critical parameter for future translational applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.