ArticleYonsei medical journal2026
Achieving Correction and Mitigating Complications in Adult Spinal Deformity through an Anterior-Posterior Combined Approach.
Article in Yonsei medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate whether incorporating an anterior stage into adult spinal deformity (ASD) correction surgery with apical segment interbody fusion can reduce surgical invasiveness and enhance radiologic correction compared to a posterior-only approach. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective review was conducted using a prospectively collected database from a single institution. A total of 150 ASD patients who underwent surgery between January 2014 and May 2021 and were followed for at least 2 years were included. Among them, 108 underwent a posterior-only approach (P group), and 42 underwent a combined anterior-posterior approach (AP group). Radiologic outcomes, bone fusion rates, clinical outcomes, and complications were assessed at baseline, immediately postoperatively, and at 2 years postoperatively.
resultsThe AP group received an average of 2.2±0.6 levels of interbody fusion at the deformity apex. Compared to the P group, the AP group had significantly lower Schwab grade of posterior osteotomy, reduced total blood loss, and shorter posterior operative time. The AP group demonstrated a significantly greater coronal correction of the major Cobb angle. Regarding sagittal balance, the AP group also achieved more harmonious alignment across most parameters throughout the 2-year follow-up, although the differences were not statistically significant. Clinical outcomes, complication rates, and fusion rates were comparable between the two groups.
conclusionAdding an anterior stage of apical segment interbody fusion to spinal deformity correction can achieve reduced surgical invasiveness and better spinal alignment without increasing the risk of major complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.